![]() |
|
HOME/ARCHIVES http://www.kazooweb.com/textes/ |
| ******************************** Week 13, 2005 THE BEST SELLERS (recent popular articles -- aller savoir pourquoi, mais ceux-ci plaisent encore !): 1) The Economist: Jacques Chirac, socialist [Jacques Chirac serait le parfait homme de gauche.] 2) The Economist: The future of innovation [Pour de plus en plus d'entreprises, ce sont leurs clients qui sont le moteur de l'innovation.] 3) The Miami Herald/Dave Barry: Man's best friend is always ready [HUMOUR : Dave nous parle des chiens.] 4) The New York Times/Travel: Does the affordable Paris bistro still exist? [Existe-il encore de bistrots parisiens bon marché ?] |
|
******************************** |
| ******************************** THIS WEEK'S TEXTS: Summary 9) Slate/Moneybox: The greatest job in business [La meilleure planque pour un homme d'affaires, c'est le poste de vice-président du conseil d'administration.] 10) The Economist: Anti-social behavior [Un retour sur les fameuses ASBO, les ordonnances britanniques contre les incivilités.] 11) AFP: Let them drink tap water [Les tentatives de la ville de Paris de promouvoir l'eau de robinet.] 12) The Miami Herald/Dave Barry: Man's best friend is always ready [HUMOUR : Dave nous parle des chiens.] 13) The Economist/Charlemagne: Not at your service [Souvenez-vous de la directive Bolkestein ?] 14) The Washington Post: Clean like a pro [On peut maintenant suivre un stage pour apprendre à faire le ménage. |
|
******************************** Jacques Chirac, socialist WHEN France's president, Jacques Chirac, dropped in recently on José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, Spain's Socialist prime minister, his host paid him a rather unusual compliment. Some people may well wonder, said Mr Zapatero, whether Jacques Chirac really is a leader of the centre-right, compared with others that we know. In recent months, the pair seem to have become inseparable, meeting for summits and congratulating each other on their shared vision. To many outside France, it might seem odd that Europe's longest-serving conservative leader is so keen to identify closely with a Spanish Socialist. Yet Mr Chirac's fondness for his new Spanish friend should perhaps not be that much of a surprise. For Mr Chirac himself is these days one of the most left-wing of Europe's leaders. Consider Mr Chirac's credentials as a champion of the left. His recent proposal to create an international solidarity levy on international financial transactions or airline-ticket sales, so as to finance African development and the fight against AIDS, won him the acclaim of the third-world lobby. Development is both the greatest challenge and the greatest urgency of our time, he declared in a speech broadcast at the World Economic Forum in Davos in January, calling Africa's poverty morally unacceptable. Mr Chirac is also a certified écolo (green), having got his cherished environmental charter enshrined in France's constitution last month. This puts the right to live in a healthy environment on the same legal footing in France as human rights, setting the country up as a pioneer in environmental protectionand Mr Chirac as potential saviour of the planet. The French president has no rivals as global spokesman on anti-Americanism, a doctrine that usually belongs to the left in Europe but in France has a long history on the Gaullist right as well. To this, he has added his own blend of anti-globalisation, globe-trotting with the likes of Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, a former trade-union leader, and dispatching representatives to the World Social Forum. Moreover, with his Arabist foreign policy in the Middle East, and his defiant hostility to the war in Iraq, he seems to have a soft-left world outlook that would fit well on any university campus. On economic matters, this is certainly no market-liberalising, right-wing government. In May, Mr Chirac will celebrate ten years in office. It is hard to detect what mark his decade has left. Admittedly, he shared five years (1997-2002) with a Socialist government, which introduced such policies as the 35-hour week. But even this is not something that Mr Chirac's present centre-right government, under Jean-Pierre Raffarin, has been in any rush to dismantle: its reforms have loosened the rules, not overturned them. Mr Chirac has contined to resist EU efforts to liberalise the energy market. He is now blocking the services directive, which he said this week was unacceptable and should be picked apart. He has even reactivated an interventionist industrial policy. And he has a high spender's tendency to throw money at political problems, especially ones that spill out on to the streetone reason why France's budget deficit has widened sharply. Only this week, Mr Chirac's government was busy yet again caving in to demands for public-sector pay rises after 600,000-1m protesters took to the streets. Having stood firm for a full three days, it promised to reopen wage talks, and did not rule out another increase in the minimum wage, after a rise of 5.8% last year. Even the left-leaning Libération could scarcely believe it: The volte-face of the government, which is today proposing to open the coffers which it swore yesterday were empty, will prove right all the numerous unionists who believe that there is no point in discussing coolly and that social dialogue is a sham unless they turn up at the negotiating table with a loaded gun. Mr Chirac has not strayed entirely from centre-right territory. He campaigned for election in 2002 with a promise to cut income tax by a third, and this is still official policy. Yet the combined efforts of four successive finance ministers have secured only a modest 10% reduction. He is pressing ahead with privatisation too: his latest finance minister, Thierry Breton, has confirmed that Electricité de France and Gaz de France are being prepared for sale. But the right hardly has a monopoly on privatisation, a policy embraced in some ways just as fervently by the former Socialist government. What does all this add up to? Compared with the rest of the European rightBerlusconi, Merkel, Aznarhe is certainly different, comments a leading French Socialist. They are all both more liberal and more Atlanticist. Mr Chirac's economic policy certainly puts him to the left of Britain's Tony Blair. Even Germany's Gerhard Schröder has done more to deregulate the labour market and reform welfare than Mr Chirac. His new chum, Mr Zapatero, is arguably his closest ideological ally now. One explanation for Mr Chirac's embrace of a soft-left, statist, instinctively anti-capitalist creed could be that he is playing Mr Blair's post-ideological game of stealing the opposition's clothes ahead of the 2007 presidential election. A French presidential candidate needs broad electoral appeal in the run-off, and the country's political centre of gravity lies well to the left of Britain's, say. Another explanation is that his variety of continental conservatism belongs to a social Gaullist tradition, whichlike Christian Democracyoften defines itself precisely against liberalism. Under this doctrine, the language of social cohesion and solidarity belongs to the right as much as to the left. In other words, Mr Chirac has not been liberalising simply because, as one adviser says, he does not believe in untempered liberalism. Yet this may be to lend more coherence to Mr Chirac's
policies than they deserve. More plausibly, exactly 40 years since he
was first elected to public office, he is guided less by conviction than
by a desire to keep the social peace and avoid confrontation. As prime
minister in the late-1980s, Mr Chirac was seen as an energetic reformer.
Age and power have tempered such zeal; consensus now matters more than
change. At the EU summit next week to consider economic reforms, France
will again be in the rearguard, not the vanguard. Despite GDP growth of
only 2-2.5% this year, and unemployment of 10%, Mr Chirac's advisers argue
that not much in the French model needs radical change. Try telling that
to the jobless. |
|
******************************** How and why smart companies are harnessing the creativity of their customers LAST November, engineers in the healthcare division of General Electric (GE) unveiled something called the LightSpeed VCT, a scanner that can create a startlingly good three-dimensional image of a beating heart. This spring Staples, an American office-supplies retailer, will stock its shelves with a gadget called a wordlock, a padlock that uses words instead of numbers. In Munich, meanwhile, engineers at BMW have begun prototyping telematics (combining computing and telecoms) and online services for a new generation of luxury cars. The connection? In each case, the firm's customers have played a big part (GE, BMW) or the leading role (Staples) in designing the product. How does innovation happen? The familiar story involves boffins in academic institutes and R&D labs. But lately, corporate practice has begun to challenge this old-fashioned notion. Open-source software development is already well-known. Less so is the fact that Bell, an American bicycle-helmet maker, has collected hundreds of ideas for new products from its customers, and is putting several of them into production. Or that Electronic Arts (EA), a maker of computer games, ships programming tools to its customers, posts their modifications online and works their creations into new games. And so on. Not only is the customer king: now he is market-research head, R&D chief and product-development manager, too. This is not all new. Researchers such as Nikolaus Franke at the University of Vienna and Christian Lüthje at the Technical University of Hamburg have demonstrated the importance of past user contributions to the evolution of everything from sporting equipment to construction materials and scientific instruments. But the rise of online communities, together with the development of powerful and easy-to-use design tools, seems to be boosting the phenomenon, as well as bringing it to the attention of a wider audience, says Eric Von Hippel of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who is about to publish a book, Democratising Innovation (MIT Press). User innovation has always been around, he says. The difference is that people can no longer deny that it is happening. Indeed, it is very likely that the majority of innovation happens this way, says Mr Von Hippel. Such innovation, he says, has a much higher rate of success. According to Mr Von Hippel, in the past firms have mostly resisted customer innovation or not known what to do with it. American farmers were lobbying manufacturers to make cars with detachable back seats as early as 1909. It took Detroit more than a decade to invent the pick-up truck. Even now, carmakers respond to customer modifications such as performance-exhaust systems by voiding the warranty. Within three weeks of launching Mindstorms, a build-it-yourself robot development system, in 1997, Lego was facing around 1,000 hackers who had downloaded its operating system, vastly improved it, and posted their work freely online. After a long stunned silence, Lego appears to have accepted the merits of this community's work: programs written in hacker language may now be uploaded to the Mindstorms website, for example. DIY innovation BMW's efforts to harness the creativity of its customers began two years ago, says Joerg Reimann, the firm's head of marketing innovation management, when it posted a toolkit on its website. This toolkit let BMW's customers develop ideas showing how the firm could take advantage of advances in telematics and in-car online services. From the 1,000 customers who used the toolkit, BMW chose 15 and invited them to meet its engineers in Munich. Some of their ideas (which remain under wraps for now) have since reached the prototype stage, says BMW. They were so happy to be invited by us, and that our technical experts were interested in their ideas, says Mr Reimann. They didn't want any money. BMW is now broadening its customer-innovation efforts. Westwood Studios, a game developer now owned by EA, first noticed its customers innovating its products after the launch of a game, Red Alert, in 1996: gamers were making new content for existing games and posting it freely on fan websites. Westwood made a conscious decision to embrace this phenomenon, says Mike Verdu of EA. Soon it was shipping basic game-development tools with its games, and by 1999 had a dedicated department to feed designers and producers working on new projects with customer innovations of existing ones. The fan community has had a tremendous influence on game design, says Mr Verdu, and the games are better as a result. Traditionally, firms have innovated by sending out market researchers to discover unmet needs among their customers. These researchers report back. The firm decides which ideas to develop and hands them over to project-development teams. Studies suggest that about three-quarters of such projects fail. Harnessing customer innovation requires different methods, says Mr Von Hippel. Instead of taking the temperature of a representative sample of customers, firms must identify the few special customers who innovate. Researchers call such customers lead users. GE's healthcare division calls them luminaries. They tend to be well-published doctors and research scientists from leading medical institutions, says GE, which brings up to 25 luminaries together at regular medical advisory board sessions to discuss the evolution of GE's technology. GE then shares some of its advanced technology with a subset of luminaries who form an inner sanctum of good friends, says Sholom Ackelsberg of GE Healthcare. GE's products then emerge from collaboration with these groups. Staples found its luminaries by holding a competition among customers to come up with new product ideas. It got 8,300 submissions, says Michael Collins, boss of the Big Idea Group, a start-up firm that helped Staples to organise its competition. At the heart of most thinking about innovation is the belief that people
expect to be paid for their creative work: hence the need to protect and
reward the creation of intellectual property. One really exciting thing
about user-led innovation is that customers seem willing to donate their
creativity freely, says Mr Von Hippel. This may be because it is their
only practical option: patents are costly to get and often provide only
weak protection. Some people may value the enhanced reputation and network
effects of freely revealing their work more than any money they could
make by patenting it. Either way, some firms are starting to believe that
there really is such a thing as a free lunch.
|
|
******************************* Man's best friend is always ready DAVE BARRY I'm trying to convince my wife that we need a dog. I grew up with dogs, and am comfortable with their ways. If we're visiting someone's home, and I suddenly experience a sensation of humid warmth, and I look down and see that my right arm has disappeared up to the elbow inside the mouth of a dog the size of a medium horse, I am not alarmed. I know that this is simply how a large, friendly dog says: ''Greetings! You have a pleasing salty taste!'' I respond by telling the dog that he is a GOOD BOY and pounding him with hearty blows, blows that would flatten a cat like a hairy pancake, but which only make the dog like me more. He likes me so much that he goes and gets his Special Toy. This is something that used to be a recognizable object -- a stuffed animal, a basketball, a Federal Express driver -- but has long since been converted, through countless hours of hard work on the dog's part, into a random wad of filth held together by 73 gallons of congealed dog spit. ''GIVE ME THAT!'' I shout, grabbing an end of the Special Toy. This pleases the dog: It confirms his belief that his Special Toy is the most desirable item in the universe, more desirable even than the corpse of a squirrel. For several seconds we fight for this prize, the dog whipping his head side to side like a crazed windshield wiper. Finally I yank the Special Toy free and hold it triumphantly aloft. The dog watches it with laser-beam concentration, his entire body vibrating with excitement, waiting for me to throw it . . . waiting . . . waiting . . . until finally I cock my arm, and, with a quick motion I . . . . . . fake a throw. I'm still holding the Special Toy. But WHOOOSH the dog has launched himself across the room, an unguided pursuit missile, reaching a velocity of 75 miles per hour before WHAM he slams headfirst into the wall at the far end of the room. This stimulates the M&M-size clump of nerve cells that serves as a dog's brain to form a thought: The Special Toy is not here! WHERE IS THE SPECIAL TOY?? The dog whirls, sees the toy in my hand and races back across the room. Just as he reaches me, I cock my arm and . . . . . . fake another throw. WHOOOSH! WHAM! The fake works again! It will always work. I can keep faking throws until the dog has punched a dog-shaped hole completely through the far wall, and the dog will STILL sprint back to me, sincerely believing that THIS time, I'm going to throw the toy. This is one reason why I love dogs. My wife, who would not touch the Special Toy with a barge pole, is less impressed. She fails to see the appeal of an animal that appears to be less intelligent than its own parasites. Oh, I've tried to explain the advantages of having a dog. For example: A DOG IS ALWAYS READY. It doesn't matter for what: Dogs are just ready. If you leave your car window open, the dog will leap into the car and sit there for hours. It will sit there for DAYS, if you let it. Because the dog knows that sometimes the car just starts moving, and you have to be ready! Usually the dog will sit in the driver's seat, in case (You never know!) the dog is called upon to steer. A DOG IS VIGILANT. One time, on a movie set, I watched a small dog walk past a line of six metal light stands. When the dog came to the sixth light stand -- which was EXACTLY the same as the other five light stands -- the dog stopped and began barking furiously at it. The dog would NOT stop. The owner finally had to drag the dog away, with the dog yanking wildly at its leash, still enraged by the light stand. Clearly the dog had detected some hostile intent in this particular light stand, something that we humans, with our inferior senses, were not aware of. We humans were thinking: ''What's WRONG with that dog?'' Whereas the light stand was thinking: ''Whew! That was close!'' These are just a couple of examples of the practical benefits provided by dogs. There are many more, and I have tried pointing them out to my wife, but she doesn't see it. This is why, in our house, we have fish. They're nice fish, but they're not a whole lot of fun. Although they are excellent drivers. ^RETURN TO TOP^ |
|
******************************* http://travel2.nytimes.com/2005/03/13/travel/13tables.html INSIDE Chez Michel, a cozy neighborhood bistro beyond the Gare du Nord, the atmosphere is a tad nautical, the menu dotted with specialties of Brittany. My companion and I share brouillade d'oeufs, the creamy stew of scrambled eggs and cream, a stew of wild boar and a fantastic brandade de morue, the elegant and classic salt cod mousse - this one served in a little jam jar, beautifully browned on top and accompanied by broiled tomato, tapenade and salad. We eat well - too well, bien sûr - and can't come close to finishing what's set before us, three-plus courses and no stinting in sight. I finish with a gorgeous Paris-Brest - cream-filled puff pastry with almonds; she, with a quince claufoutis. It is a meal any chef would be proud of, and one that would immensely please most diners. The prix fixe bill: 30 euros each, or $40, at $1.35 to the euro. Paris isn't cheap: its luxury restaurants are among the world's most expensive, and the neighborhood bistro is no longer common. But a careful search reveals places both old and new that are not only affordable but terrific. There remains a tradition of chefs' setting a budget and then finding the food that will work within it, and frequent changes of the menu maintain interest and help take advantage of seasonal decreases in price. Furthermore, the frequent use of less expensive ingredients - beautifully prepared eggs, respectfully treated local fish and less expensive (and often more flavorful) cuts of meat - is an important factor in holding prices down. It helps, too, that many of these restaurants barely nod to ambience or service; the clichés about being ignored by servers are all too often well grounded in reality. But for good-to-spectacular food at near-bargain prices, this scene is hard to beat. At each of the following restaurants, I found myself saying, "I would kill to have a place like this in my neighborhood." And, remember, all of this takes place in Paris. Not bad. L'OS À MOELLE With its blackboard menu, unimpressive country look and relatively remote location (in the 15th Arrondissement, just beyond the Eiffel Tower), the food at L'Os à Moelle had better be good. And it is, almost amazingly so, especially the 38-euro prix fixe menu. The seating is fairly comfortable, too, so the couple of hours you spend indulging your palate won't leave you crippled. The table is set with good rye bread with a super crust and bulots - the large snails that are so delicious one would happily order them if they weren't being offered free - served with a parsley sauce. This was followed by a soup of Jerusalem artichokes with crunchy croutons and a shaving of black truffles. My companion opted for seared foie gras, served quite rare, with apples, beet greens and a slightly sweet dressing, while I chose a black truffle omelet. Other highlights: big scallops, served in shells, with root vegetables, lots of butter, and salt, and a huge, gorgeous marrow bone, served with a small steak. Desserts were a first-rate chocolate mousse and gratin of fruit with crème anglaise. The wine list was filled with relatively inexpensive and quite decent selections from Burgundy, not a coincidence - you will probably want a good red here. CAFÉ MODERNE Across from the old Bourse, in a businesslike neighborhood with little night life, Café Moderne feels as if its owners were enamored of New York style. The clean, unfrilly look and very good service - far more attentive than what one comes to expect in Paris - show that the owners are striving to occupy a different niche. The prix fixe for both lunch and dinner is 30 euros. Though generally very good, the food is more contemporary than classic bistro fare. My favorite dish, hands down, is the fried oeufs mollet on a bed of spinach, topped with bacon. (Oeufs mollets are six-minute eggs, which, done correctly, yield the same texture as a properly poached egg and can be removed intact from their shells. Here, they are rolled in bread crumbs and fried.) I cannot help but wonder how often I would begin the day with this if I were given the option. There's another exemplary dish, a "millefeuille" with pastry cream and fruit (on my visit, pears, but I'm sure it changes seasonally). I put quotation marks around millefeuille because it's closer to a three-layer sandwich than a true millefeuille, and, rather than puff pastry, the crisp layers are thin cookies made from butter and sugar, with just enough flour to crisp them up. In between, the food has its highs and lows: nicely crisped dorade, served with green cabbage, tiny clams and beurre blanc, was a winner, as was risotto with langoustine. Pan-fried chicken stuffed with garlic and herbs, with about a pound of mashed potatoes and a sweet and sour brown sauce, is a bit too straightforward, which isn't to say it was not good enough to finish. A couple of other dishes were questionable, especially the lasagna with escargot. Nevertheless, the pluses far outweigh the minuses here. The small but carefully assembled wine list is filled with bargains, and on Mondays great wines are offered at cost (beware: it's not easy to get in on those nights, though it's worth a shot). LA RÉGALADE When the ownership (and chef) of La Régalade changed last summer, many of its regulars feared a great thing was gone forever. I can hardly count myself as a regular, but a recent visit revealed little change: this remains a bistro worth the journey from anywhere in town. It's hard to get into; it's crowded and cramped; you will certainly not be the only Americans there (many locals appear to have given up); the service can be astonishingly rude (ask for something whenever you catch a server's eye; your next opportunity could be a half hour later) ... and the food remains terrific. When the staff deigns to notice you, you're brought a pork terrine, along with bread and cornichons. The terrine, which is so silken one might think it contained 80 percent fat, is divine; you could easily get full on this and a glass of Beaujolais, and probably leave without anyone's noticing. But that would not be wise. You might miss the exemplary brouillade d'oeufs (with black truffles, for a supplementary charge), and you would not be able to exclaim, as did one of my companions upon cutting into a breast of pork with glistening, crunchy skin and a fork-tender underbelly, "This is the best thing I ever ate in my life." It was certainly up there, and my other visits indicate that someone in your party should always order the slow-roasted pork special - these vary, and are all good. This trip, I was satisfied with a quite Spanish dish of arroz nero with squid cut like baby eels and enough garlic to make my ears wiggle. Cheese, desserts, wine - it's all good. The fixed price for both lunch and dinner is 30 euros, and though you'll undoubtedly select a dish that carries a supplement, at 40 euros it's still a bargain. I suppose one should be thankful for the less-than-adequate service, because it undoubtedly keeps some diners away, leaving room for those of us who will tolerate almost anything for food this good. AUX LYONNAIS This is the Lyon-style bistro of Alain Ducasse, one of the world's best-known chefs (his partner here is Thierry de la Brosse, who owns another bistro, L'Ami Louis, in the Marais). Uncomfortable seating and climate control aside, this provides a very good eating experience. In fact, many people will prefer it to Mr. Ducasse's overdone three-star (Michelin) extravaganzas at the Plaza Athénée and elsewhere. There is a 28-euro prix fixe at Aux Lyonnais, but the best offerings are à la carte. Here, the gutsy food is prepared with great attention, and the service is better than average. (You have to figure that Mr. Ducasse's staff is reasonably well trained.) I've eaten my way through the menu and have yet to find a nondessert dish that I didn't adore. Eggs cooked in cream with mushrooms and shrimp were universally beloved (one of my companions, who ate this back in October, is still talking about it); a stew of winter vegetables (served in January) was a surefire remedy for midwinter blues, containing chestnuts, salsify, turnips, shallots, onions, potatoes, a load of butter and a bit of good stock. There is sabodet, a variation of a classic Lyonnaise dish of salami and potatoes, here stewed in sauce gribiche; it is enormously satisfying. On one visit I shared a pot of braised pork belly (bacon), something for which Mr. Ducasse is justifiably famous. The place is drop-dead gorgeous, an 1890 bistro that does not feel contrived, with cement tile floors, walls painted amber (they look smoke-stained but my guess is this is a mock-up), zinc moldings, iron-mounted tables, and so on. It is not the movie-set look of Le Grand Colbert (which you have seen in movies), but it is one of the bistros of your dreams, or at least of mine. The wine list focuses on the Rhone region; I strongly suggest you order the pink sparkler Bugey Serdon, which one doesn't see too often in the north of France (and almost never in the States). It's fruity, enjoyable and cheap. CHEZ DENISE I well remember the first time I visited this boisterous, usually smoky, bistro near Les Halles. It is often packed, with its inaccessible banquettes - benches may be a better word - filled with diners, elbow to elbow. A neighbor, struggling with a pot of tripe au calvados that was clearly enough for four, practically forced a plateful on me before I'd even ordered. It's that kind of place - friendly, truly unpretentious, fun - and filled with meat, mostly off-cuts. In fairness, there are vegetables on the menu and, at the right time of year, they're wonderful. The most popular, however, remain the French fries, served, as is everything else, in abundance. I'd start with something like leeks vinaigrette (you'll get a pound of leeks - I'm only exaggerating slightly) or a frisée salad; starting with saucissons or pâté is complete overkill. The main courses are almost all meat, and they're huge. The côte de boeuf, served with marrow bones, is theoretically for two but really suitable for a family of four. On my most recent visit I ordered pied de cochon and was served an entire foot, grilled. The waiter mocked me because it didn't come with French fries - they are really not to be missed - but my companion's calf's liver did, and since she was busy with the liver and its mound of bacon, I got my share. The crisp-tender pig's foot was work, as it always is when the kitchen doesn't disassemble it (there are 32 bones in a pig's foot), but it was a chore well worth tackling. Other choices include kidney, brains, steaks and chops, and I've yet to find a loser among them. A meal comes to about 30 euros. The barrels of Brouilly (one of the nine crus Beaujolais) at the front door tell you what you ought to be ordering, and a quick look around tells you where to head for dessert. Many people opt for the cheese tray, which is fun: it's set on your table, and you serve yourself as you like. And sharing an île flotante - meringue in a kind of custard soup, with caramel drizzled on top - is a faux "light" way to finish up. Bill of Fare A few words of advice: All these restaurants take reservations, and I'd advise that you book any of them at least a few days in advance. And even if a restaurant is nearly empty, a reservation - even a half-hour in advance - will often get you treated a little bit better. Typically, in Paris (and France in general), the no-smoking laws are ignored. If you ask to be seated in a no-smoking section, chances are you'll simply be seated with other Americans (which, generally speaking, works). The price for a meal for two, with wine and tip, at these six restaurants is about 100 euro, or $135. And though they all accept credit cards, it's safer to assume that American Express will be refused; take your Visa card or MasterCard. You can travel to all of these places effortlessly (and relatively inexpensively) by taxi, or with a little work by Mètro. |
| ******************************** THE REGULARS |
|
******************************** Easter - History, Facts and the Bunny Rabbit When the chocolate bunnies come out, you know Easter is just around the corner. Not that Easter is all about chocolate. People celebrate this holiday according to their religious beliefs. Christians honor Good Friday as the day that Jesus Christ died and Easter Sunday as the day that He was resurrected. Palm Sunday is the Sunday before Easter and the day Jesus arrived in Jerusalem. Easter - That Crazy Rabbit Easter Around The World Easter - Did U Know? |
|
******************************** You are kidnapped and unceremoniously dumped on a deserted island in
the Pacific, a previously deserted island. But this island basically is
16 km long and about a hundred meters wide, and it's completely covered
with grass and palm trees. And your captors have been nice enough to give
you a few things to assist you in surviving. They've given you a supply
of water. They've given you a flashlight and a box of matches and a blanket.
So, the first day, you walk around the island, and you notice that you've
got no chance of escape because the island is sheer drop-off all around,
200 meters onto sharp rocks into shark-infested waters. And the question is: How do you save your sorry butt until your wife can pay off the ransom? |
|
********************************
Privacy Protector Dear Priv, Prudie, privately -*-*-*- Happy With Alone Time Dear Happy, Prudie, conclusively |
| ******************************** 8) CNN/Global Offic: Women "opt out" of career success [De plus en plus de femmes qualifiées abandonnent leur carrière, provoquant une crise pour les entreprises, appellées à revoir leur façon de traiter le rapport travail-famille.] http://edition.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/03/15/optout.revolution/index.html Women 'opt out' of career success (CNN) -- Women are finding it as hard as ever to achieve success in the workplace, according to an extensive new study reported in the Harvard Business Review. The ousting of Carly Fiorina from her position as chief executive at Hewlett-Packard may have made headlines last month, but the survey shows that many women are choosing to climb off the ladder voluntarily far earlier in their working lives. It confirms the trend -- described in a New York Times-coined phrase as the "opt-out revolution" -- that highly qualified women are dropping out of promising careers in far larger numbers than their male counterparts. Around 40 percent of women have taken an "off-ramp" at some point in their working lives compared with just a quarter of men, according to the study, conducted by the Center for Work-Life Policy. And while men tend to leave jobs for reasons of "strategic repositioning," such as switching careers or starting a business, women are most likely to quit for "family reasons" -- typically to raise children but also to care for elderly parents or other family members. Among Stanford University's class of 1981 57 percent of female graduates had left the workforce, while just 38 percent of women from three graduating classes at Harvard Business School were still in fulltime careers, the research showed. The trend has worrying implications for management culture. According to Ethical Corporation magazine, just 11 percent of Fortune 500 senior executives are women, while there are only eight serving female CEOs. Yet a survey last year by women's advocacy organization Catalyst found that companies with a higher representation of women in senior positions financially out-performed those with proportionally fewer women at the top. The key to encouraging more women to pursue their careers to a senior level is the promotion of more flexible and female-friendly working conditions, the report suggested. "No one wants to be a superwoman anymore," wrote Guardian newspaper columnist Madeline Bunting on the report's conclusions. "Women have struggled to reconcile their femininity with a male working culture built around single-mindedness, competitiveness and self-projection." Alpha males thrive in a business culture of all-nighters, "road warrior" business trips and Blackberry-dependency. But the report showed that female workers were increasingly being alienated by a male-orientated approach in which career survival had become "a relentless winnowing process." While almost all women who had taken an "off-ramp" from a senior position said they planned to return to work, just five percent said they would be happy to return to the same employer. And in the business sector, 100 percent of women said they would not consider returning to their former company. "If ever there is a danger sign for corporate
America, this is it," said report co-authors Sylvia Ann Hewlett,
the founder of the Center for Work-Life Policy, and Carolyn Buck Luce,
a partner at Ernst & Young. "Employers can no longer pretend
that treating women as 'men in skirts' will fix their retention problems."
"Like it or not, large numbers of highly qualified, committed women
need to take time out. The trick is to help them maintain connections
that will allow them to come back from that time without being marginalized
for the rest of their careers." |
|
******************************** |
|
******************************** The Greatest Job in Business Clawing your way to the top of the corporate ladder has its appeal: The chairman and CEO get gobs of money, the power to move markets, the keys to the Gulfstream, and minions paid to nod their heads in awe. But really, it's so much work. Wouldn't it be better to be vice chairman? There are no magazines about vice chairmen and no suck-up profiles in Fortune about them. They don't write advice books, because no one cares what they have to say. No one even cares if they show up in the office. In shortexcept for one slight drawbackthey have the greatest job in business. You will not be surprised to learn that many of them are excellent golfers. Corporate America is chock full of vice chairmen and anecdotally, at least, the number of people holding the job appears to be climbing. At some companies, it's not uncommon to have four or five vice chairmen at the same time, even though corporate headhunters say they never recruit for the position. That's because despite the lofty title, vice chairman is almost always considered a demotiona clear sign that someone's career is stuck in neutral and about to head into reverse. (This is the drawback.) "It's a great title for a position where you don't have to do anything," says Tom McLane, who happens to be vice chairman of the Directorship Search Group, an executive search firm based in Greenwich, Ct. The greatest thing about the jobbesides the hours, which tend to be limited since most vice chairmen don't have all that much responsibility, is that very few vices wind up taking a pay cut. Some even get raises. Newly public Valor Communications gave its former CEO, Kenneth R. Cole, a $5 million transition payment when it made him vice chairman last April. He's also collecting $300,000 in salary, despite being required to devote only around 25 percent of his time to the company. Three of Atlanta-based SunTrust Bank's vice chairmen made over $1 million last year in salary and bonus. But don't dash off your résumé just yet. This is a tough job to get: It almost exclusively goes to a top executive who's been shafted. One easy way to get the job is to lose out in the power grab to become CEO. That's what seems to have happened to Lois Juliber, a top executive at Colgate-Palmolive, who was named a vice chairwoman last July along with fellow top executive Javier Teruel. At the same time, the company named Ian Cook chief operating officer, a job viewed as next in line to become CEO. Last month, Juliber announced that she was retiring on April 1. Teruel is still there, at least for now, though he's undoubtedly talking to headhunters. Most vice chairmen who wind up with the job this way tend to get bored pretty quickly. Another common path to vice chairman's office is through a merger. This is the primary reason that headhunters believe the ranks of vice chairmen have been growing. After all, there's usually only room for one No. 1 and in most mergers, that job belongs to the CEO at the company doing the buying. Big deals like the one between Procter & Gamble and Gillette, or SBC and AT&T are likely to lead to a wavelet of vice chairmen. Banks are particularly prolific when it comes to handing out the title: Last year, SunTrust had five vice chairmen and Charlotte-based Bank of America had two. Merger-fallout vice chairmen tend to mill around the office for a year or two, before heading off to the golf course full-time. Sometimes entrepreneurs wind up as vice chairmen when they decide they'd rather start spending the money they've made instead of spending all of their time glued to their BlackBerrys. Nextel co-founder Morgan O'Brien has been a vice chairman at the company since 1996, though he stepped down from active employment in November 2003. Outback Steakhouse announced this month that co-founder Robert Basham was stepping down as chief operating officer to become vice chairman. Of course, some vice chairmen have actual responsibility. Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger is widely viewed as Warren Buffet's partner despite having the vice chairman's title. And some vices eventually make it into the big chair. Jim Skinner was named vice chairman of McDonald's in December 2002. At the time, it was widely viewed as a sign that he was out of the running. But the company's next two CEOs died in quick succession, and Skinner was anointed CEO last November. Still, the more common move is from vice chairman to consultant. Indeed, three of SunTrust's former vice chairmen became paid consultants to the bank. Which, come to think of it, may be an even better job than that of vice chairman, since it requires even less time in the office. Michelle Leder writes a daily
blog at www.footnoted.org that looks at SEC filings and is the author
of Financial Fine Print: Uncovering a Company's True Value. |
|
******************************** Enemies of the state? THE trouble began in Meersbrook, a district of the poor northern town of Sheffield, in the autumn of 2003. At first it was just a group of teenagers loitering outside a shop on the corner of Valley Road and Brooklyn Road. But their numbers grew, swelled by an unruly family that had recently moved in nearby. Walls were soon covered with graffiti, fireworks were let off in the street and drug dealers began to tout for customers. For Sale signs appeared on local houses. A neighbourhood that had never been particularly cohesive seemed about to fall apart. Then, last August, the police secured a dispersal order, which enabled them to break up groups of loiterers and return under-16s to their homes. They also asked six local people to sign contracts promising not to misbehave. The contracts have no legal force, but seem to have worked. The graffiti have gone, the gang is smaller and better mannered and, as Steve Kidder, a local shopkeeper, puts it, we're gradually getting back to where we were. Until recently, Sheffield's police would probably not have devoted so much energy to solving a neighbourhood problem. Their prioritiesdetermined largely by the Home Office, 140 miles away in Londonwere tackling burglars, car thieves and other criminals who could be locked up for a satisfyingly long time. But priorities have changed and resources been redirected. Eighteen months ago, the local sergeant, Alan Boyle, had four officers to deploy in the area. He will soon have 20. The change is a response to demand, partly from local people and partly from the government, for action against the kind of petty irritations collectively described as anti-social behaviour. Five years ago, the concept was almost unknown. These days, it is one of the most prominent issues in local and national politics and in the British press (see chart). That is probably not because there is more of it about. Vandalism (the closest proxy for it in the statistics) has declined since the mid-1990s along with most other crimes. Rather, says Louise Casey, director of the government's anti-social-behaviour unit, public concern has migrated from old-fashioned things like burglary and car theft to petty incivilities. As crime has fallen, it has opened up some spare capacity to worry about litter, graffiti and abandoned cars. The other reason more attention
is paid to anti-social behaviour is that there are more tools for dealing
with it. Most powerful of these is the anti-social behaviour order (ASBO)a
civil order, lasting for a minimum of two years, that can be used severely
to restrict a person's liberties. In September 2003, a mentally unstable
drunk, Paul Booker, was barred from doing anything likely to cause
harassment, alarm or distress to anybody in Sheffield, or from using
any bus, tram or train in South Yorkshire. Perhaps not surprisingly, he
soon broke the order and was jailed. In Sheffield, ASBOs are generally sought only after milder techniques have failed to change a person's behaviour. Just 49 have been handed out since 1999one to a Meersbrook resident. That contrasts with other northern cities such as Manchester, where 20 orders are being handed out every month. There, according to Martin Lee, head of the council's nuisance strategy group, ASBOs are frequently used as an option of first resort, even for petty troublemakers. If one person says I was intimidated while using a cash machine,' then we're in. Manchester has used ASBOs against both minor indiscretions and serious crimes. Last year, it secured an order preventing four gang members from wearing body armour or riding pedal cycles. Such a move has two advantages over prosecuting people for criminal offences: it is easier to prove a breach, and the resulting sentence is likely to be tougher. In 2003, a prolific Cardiff shoplifter was caught stealing from two shops. For one of his crimes, he was sentenced to a month's detentiona standard tariff for a persistent offender. In entering the second shop, however, he breached the terms of an ASBO. For that, he was sentenced to 18 months in prison. The government approves of Manchester's war on incivility. David Blunkett, the former home secretary, viewed the number of ASBOs handed out as a vital measure of police performance; he also affirmed that they should not necessarily be regarded as a weapon of last resort. But is the tough approach the better one? It is not yet known how many people stick to the terms of their order. Of the 855 ASBOs handed out in England and Wales between June 2000 and December 2002, just over a third305were breached in the same period. Not bad; but, since the minimum duration of an ASBO is two years, the proportion ultimately flouted will almost certainly be higher. A more important test is what happens when the forces of law and order are deployed away from areas like Meersbrook, as eventually they must be. If the Home Office's predictions turn out to be right, locals will gain the confidence to deal with petty nuisances themselves. If, on the other hand, they come to believe that the only remedy for incivility lies in the police and the courts, they are likely to remain cowed. So far, the drive against
anti-social behaviour has encouraged some neighbourly behaviour. It has
also given free rein to prejudices and suspicions. As Neil Pilkington,
the chief solicitor of Salford City Council, puts it: There are
people in every community who believe that if you're under 18 and breathing,
you ought to be on an ASBO. |
| ******************************* 11) AFP: Let them drink tap water [Les tentatives de la ville de Paris de promouvoir l'eau de robinet.] http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050322/sc_afp/afplifestylefrance_050322161751 Let them drink tap-water: Paris fights back against the bottle Tue Mar 22,11:17 AM ET PARIS (AFP) - Paris city authorities began distributing thousands of specially-designed glass carafes in a campaign to wean the public off bottled mineral water and back onto the tap. Reacting to polls showing that 51 percent of the two million Parisians buy their drinking water in shops, the city hall and publicly-owned water company Eau de Paris argue that the piped alternative is cheaper, more ecologically sound, and just as healthy. Hundreds joined a long queue at the esplanade in front of the Hotel de Ville where Parisians could present a coupon downloaded from the Internet or cut from a local newspaper in return for a carafe marked with the Eau de Paris logo and an Eiffel Tower. "People buy bottled water because of the marketing, and we realised that if we were to win them back to the tap we would have to do some marketing of our own. It's all about giving Paris water an image and explaining why it is good for you," said Franck Madureira of Eau de Paris. Some 30,000 carafes -- created by designer Pierre Cardin -- have been manufactured. A third were being handed to the public Tuesday -- which is World Water Day -- and the rest will be distributed to cafes and restaurants. "People say the taste is better when you buy it, but I think that is rubbish. And this way I get a free carafe," said Jacques-Yves Bezal, who was waiting in line. Fitting neatly into the door of a fridge and bearing a push-on top, the carafes are to be filled with water from the tap and used instead of a shop-bought bottle. "Paris water has a mineral and sanitary quality that is just as good as anything you buy in a bottle. But it is between 100 and 200 times cheaper. It is delivered straight to your home. And there is no packaging," said Anne Le Stat, president of Eau de Paris. Launching the campaign Monday, the capital's socialist mayor Bertrand Delanoe said that he drinks three litres of tap water every day. "It's good for the health. It keeps me in shape," he said. Around half of the 700,000 cubic metres of drinking water consumed every day in Paris comes from the rivers Seine and Marne, and is treated in three purification plants. The rest comes from artesian wells around the capital. "If we can tip the balance and get a majority of the population back drinking the tap variety, we will consider the campaign a success," said Madureira. The remains of a Roman aqueduct are still visible in the south of Paris, but from the Middle Ages most of the capital's water was pumped from the Seine. Napoleon brought in water by the newly-built Canal de l'Ourcq, but the modern system -- drawing on springs some 150 kilometers (100 miles away) -- was conceived during the city's late 19th century modernisation under Baron Haussmann. At the same time the city was endowed with its trademark green drinking-fountains, donated by the British philanthropist Sir Richard Wallace. ^RETURN TO TOP^ |
|
******************************* http://chezpim.typepad.com/blogs/2004/12/los_moelle_my_s.html My bistro favorite in Paris comes and goes, but there is one constant that has been a sentimental favorite since the early 90's. I just made it back there again on this last trip. That night, my friends Matt, Lynn and I just arrived in Paris for our Thanksgiving holiday. It was the only night in the trip that I had made no reservation, preferring to leave it open in case we were too jetlagged. After a rather mediocre lunch --with a bottle even more mediocre Beaujolais Nouveau that smelled of banana purée-- at a nameless bistro in our neighbourhood, I was determined to find a better place for dinner for our first night in Paris. Without a reservation on Thursday night, finding a decent place for dinner can be a little difficult. Well, not as difficult as trying to get a taxi on a Saturday night, but nonetheless. I decided to take them to La Cave de L'Os à Moelle, a tiny wine bar extension of the restaurant with the same name, and a fittingly casual place for our first night in a new time zone. We couldn't get into La Cave, but luckily there was an open table at the restaurant, so that was where we settled in for dinner. Both of these are owned by the charming Thierry Faucher, one of the young chefs trained by the affable Christian Constant at the Crillon. The four young protégés of Christian Constant during his time at the kitchen at Les Ambassadeurs, Thierry Faucher of L'Os à Moelle, Yves Camdeborde (previously) of La Régalade, Thierry Breton of Chez Michel, and Rodolpe Paquin of Le Repaire de Cartouch, were at the forefront of the Bistros Modernes movement in the early to mid 90's. It was these four friends, well trained and well on their way to garner stars of their own in the long tradition of classically trained French Chefs, who shocked the gastronomic world when they decided to each open their own bistro, each in their own little corner of Paris. Their move --the French gastronomic brain-drain if you will-- was seen as the harbinger of things to come, and had many pundits predicting the demise of French cuisine. Luckily, the foretold demise did not come to pass, and these chefs --but for the exception of Yves Camdeborde who has left La Régalade and about to open a Pension de Famille-- are still happily cooking in their own kitchen, while other young chefs, like Piège at Les Ambassadeurs, Alléno at Restaurant Le Meurice, and Frechon at Le Bristol, have risen to pick up the torch of haute cuisine. In this group of four, I would say that Camdeborde, especially at his best at La Régalade, is the most talented. The best bistro meal Ive had beating the nearest competition by far- was the first time at La Régalade. Though that restaurant in the months, or even a year before his recent departure, was lagging a bit. Paquin, at Le Repaire de Cartouche, is country and hearty, but has been rather up and down. Breton always has interesting menu items from Brittany, where he was from. While Faucher a biker dude though he is- seems to cook with the most light and feminine touch. The menu at L'Os à Moelle is small. While the price has gone up a little bit since the last time I was there, from 35 euro to 38, the format remains the same: five courses, including dessert, plus an optional small cheese course (no supplement). There are always two to three choices for each course, perhaps more for desserts, beginning with a soup course, then a light course of cold entrée, perhaps a piece of foie gras or saumon mariné. The next course is often of fish or seafood, then the final savory course is of meat or poultry. There is an optional cheese course, always accompanied by a small green salad, before the dessert. The cooking here is always
reliable, with a focus firmly on using pristine ingredients and letting
them shine. The sauces are intense but never overpowering, and often lightened
with spices such as saffron and thyme flowers, providing a nice punctuation.
Faucher particularly excels at soup and fish courses. One of the best
pieces of the humble Dorade I've had was here at L'Os à Moelle,
simply pan-fried, in a light sauce with a nose of citrus, served atop
a light as air purée -not of potato, no, perhaps salsify, i'm not
sure, it has been quite a few years. The second course was a foie gras terrine and raw scallops salad. The foie gras terrine was delicious and beautiful, a thin sliver served atop a small pile of crisp and bitter greens, sprinkled with a few bits of dried figs and a cracked walnut. StjacquesThe salad of raw St.Jacques was also quite lovely. The scallops were on the smaller side, but impeccably fresh and sweet, served with the same bitter greens, slices of almond, and a few curious ribbons of cheese. The combination was rather intriguing, and provided for some very satisfying blend of textures and flavors. The fish course had two choices as well, a Lotte Rôti, roasted monkfish, with a sweet potato puree, dried chanterelles and harring roe sauce, Lieujeunepoelleand a Lieu Jaune pôelé, pan-fried Pollack with endive in a goose reduction sauce. Lieu Jaune, a member of the cod fish family, has little taste of its own, so it did well in the flavorful yet light reduction sauce. The sharpness of harring roe was also a perfect foil for the creamy Lotte. iThe meat course on this particular menu had one irresistable item for me, a perdreau rôti, raosted partridge. This was the height of the season for game, so it was simply unthinkable for me to ignore the only game item on the menu. The partridge came perfectly roasted -perhaps on the rare side for the American palate but not for mine- with a piece of crisp bacon on top, and a mound of buttery soft sauteed savoy cabbage. Perfect. We also had a roasted saddle of rabbit and a piece of roasted lamb. The rabbit was tasty, if a bit over done to my taste. The lamb was from Limousin -Agneaurotimeaning that it has a pedegree of Indication Géographique Protégée, a protected geographic origin, similar to an AOC for wine- and was roasted to a perfect medium rare, served with roasted garlic and root vegetables, all very intense and tasty. As for our libation, we began -comme d'habitude- with a glass of Vin Cuit Provençale for Matthew and I, and a glass of pink and bubbly Cerdon du Bugey for our equally bubbly Lynn. Both of these wines are slightly sweet, the vin cuit more so than the Cerdon. Drinking something sweet before the meal is a way to get your appetite going, or so the French would have us believe. Vin Cuit Provençale, a traditional sweet wine from -you guessed it- Provence, is heated in a cauldron before aging in oak barrel. It can be served as dessert wine, or as apéritif. This particular glass was quite lovely, with a dominant nose of citrus, then a bit of nuts -hazelnut, I'd say- and also of raisin. Cerdon du Bugey is a sparkling rosé from Bugey, in the Jura mountains of Eastern France. When these four bistros modernes were first open, serving a humble Cerdon du Bugey instead of the fancypants Champagne was seen as turning their collective nose up at the more traditional ways of doing things. But I don't believe that it was done only to prove a point, Cerdon du Bugey in its approachable, lightly sweet, and bubbly nature, not to mention its prettiest shade of pink, is quite a fine and fun way to begin one's meal. I, for one, am a convert. With our food we had a bottle of lovely Chinon, a 2002 Beaumont from Catherine and Pierre Breton. A beautiful ruby-red wine that was very fruity -a nose of cassis and other berries- but with strong acidity to balance the fruits, unlike your garden-variety fruit-bomb Californian plonks. Catherine and Pierre Breton are one of the best producers in the Loire Valley, their wines are made from organic grapes, and processed with very little added sulphur. The results are lively, beautiful wines that can be found at all the cool bistros and wine bars in Paris. Next time you are in Paris and see their names on a wine menu, try a bottle, you'll thank me for it. Before the desserts we had a small cheese and salad course. The salad part was a few crunchy leaves of gorgeously purple and green leaves. I am not entirely sure what they were, but they tasted like endives. There were two small serving of cheese, I forgot to take down the names, but one was a dry aged cheese from the Pyrénées, and another something else, medium hard in texture -sort of like a creamy young gruyère- fashioned into a pretty confection on top of the dry cheese. The dessert course was delightful, Terrinedepoirea deceptively simple dacquoise of chocolate, with a chocolate-covered orange slice in a saffron sauce, also a simple poached pear made more elegant in a terrine, served with a creamy vanilla ice cream. Then there was my coup de coeur, sweet roasted figs with tangy chèvres cheese gratin on top. The top of the goat cheese was covered with burnt sugar, as in crème brulée. Gorgeous and absolutely delectable to boot. A beautiful finalé to my wonderful meal. I've been coming here since the early days of the restaurant, 1994 perhaps, way before I consider Paris my stomping grounds. This place, the bright yellow interior, the quirky art on the wall, the secret door underneath the wooden bar, all have become as familiar as an old friend to me. Many intimate dinners, many fun time with friends, and many a broken heart later, my L'Os à Moelle is still here, looking very much the same as the first time we met, serving food that is just as tasty as when I first discovered it. A la prochaîne, my old friend, it will not be so long before I see you again. ^RETURN TO TOP^ |
|
******************************* WHEN the European Union holds a summit dedicated to the economy in two weeks' time, the leaders of France and Germany might be forgiven if they covered their heads and hid under the table. The news from the two biggest economies in the euro area seems unremittingly bleak. The IMF says Germany will grow by less than 1% this year, and its headline unemployment count is now over 5m (12.6%), the highest since the 1930s. French economic growth is a bit fasteranalysts put it at about 2% this yearbut its unemployment has also gone above 10%. As luck would have it, the European Commission in Brussels has a good plan to spur growth in the EU: a services directive. This is aimed at breaking down barriers to trade in services across the EU. Manufacturing trade was mostly freed up by the internal-market programme of the 1990s. But national rules still put huge obstacles in the way of service providers that want to trade outside their home country, whether they be lawyers, architects or peddlers of public relations. Since services account for 70% of jobs in the EU, sweeping away obstacles to their trade should stimulate much growth. An independent study for the commission has concluded that the liberalisation of services could create up to 600,000 new jobs and generate new economic activity worth €33 billion ($43 billion) a year. It sounds like just the kind of lifeline that the leaders of France and Germany might want to grasp. Yet apparently it is not. Over the past fortnight, Jacques Chirac and Gerhard Schröder have taken it in turns to denounce the services directive and to demand its withdrawal. And the commission, supposedly the champion of free-market liberalisation within Europe, has buckled. Charlie McCreevy, the internal-market commissioner, announced last week that opponents of the services directive had won the debate, adding that the directive as currently written will not fly. Mr McCreevy now plans to propose substantial amendments. Economic liberals, who had considered Mr McCreevy as one of their own, are aghast. Paul Hofheinz of the Lisbon Council, a Brussels think-tank, asks what is the point of an internal-market commissioner who does not stand up for the internal market? The commission was taken by surprise by the backlash it is now facing. When the original proposal was placed before the previous commission, in the dying days of the Romano Prodi era last year, it was passed unanimously and with little discussion. But since then it has been demonised by trade unions and the left across western Europe. It does not help that the commissioner who originally proposed the directive was Frits Bolkestein, a Dutch liberal whose name is conveniently reminiscent of Frankenstein. French socialists have seized upon the Bolkestein directive as encapsulating everything they loathe about the ultra-liberal Europe that is allegedly being promoted in Brussels. Martin Shultz, leader of the Socialists in the European Parliament, says that, if the directive were passed unchanged, it would mean the destruction of the European social model. What particularly outrages opponents of the services directive is its country of origin principle. This would allow service providers based in one EU country to offer their services in another, provided only that they satisfied their own national rules and laws. The idea, modelled on what was done for goods in the 1990s, is to avoid the risk that the creation of a single market in services might necessitate even more red tape, as Brussels sought to define single harmonised standards for every sector. Opponents of the country of origin principle say it is an open invitation to social dumping, in which competition from poorer EU countries would drive down wages and welfare standards in such countries as France and Germany. German nerves are already on edge after widespread reports of a wave of job losses among workers in slaughterhouses, who are apparently being displaced by butchers employed by central European contractors. German trade unions complain that the newcomers are undercutting wages and hygiene standards. They fear that further liberalisation of services could lead to similar outcomes in other industries, such as construction and nursing. The Bolkestein defence Fans of the commission proposal say many of these concerns were catered for in the Bolkestein directive. They point out that posted workers would have to obey local social and labour legislation, wherever they are working. It would be illegal to undercut a host country's minimum wage or health-and-safety regulations, or (God forbid) to break French law on the 35-hour-week. Similarly, the commission had already left particularly sensitive services of public interest, such as transport and much of health care, outside the directive's scope. Mr McCreevy has now promised that he will look again at these exceptions and expand them further, in deference to national sensitivities. Yet the risk is that so many exceptions are written into the revised directive that the overall effect will be next to no liberalisation at all. Worse, an effort to meet Franco-German demands for minimum standards for European service providers could lead to new regulations being imposed on countries that now have relatively liberal regimes. It is possible that the services directive could be pushed back in a more liberal direction, once the French government has got over the hurdle of its referendum on the EU constitution in late May. But a deeper change of mood may also be at work. Faced with rising unemployment and growing competition, not just from China and India, but within the very gates of the EU itself, French and German political leaders have sometimes spoken boldly of the need to embrace reform. But in tough times, it is always tempting to reach for old certainties. And regulatory and protectionist instincts still run deep in the countries that invented the Napoleonic code and the craft guild. ^RETURN TO TOP^
|
|
******************************* http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59717-2005Mar23.html By Annie Groer I love to cook, am a whiz with a hot iron and rather enjoy polishing the family silver(plate). But the larger task of cleaning an entire apartment or house leaves me cold. Always has. I might have remained forever ignorant of what it really means to clean from "top to bottom" (remember this phrase, it will reappear) had not a flyer from MaidPro, the Boston-based national cleaning franchise, recently come my way. "All our service providers are professionally trained through our MaidPro University," the ad boasted. University? Where better to acquire a remedial education than from a firm that charges by the hour, trains two-person crews to clean as many as four houses a day, and has as its pun-ly motto, "It's About Time." Clearly grime is money. My professor was self-described "neat freak," Philip Doyle, who spent 25 years in hotel management (housekeeping was definitely part of his portfolio) before he bought the Adams Morgan MaidPro franchise in October. His classroom was the Spring Valley home of a client, where I watched Doyle and one of his top cleaners do everything from shaking dead leaves off a pair of potted trees and dusting oil paintings with a fat, sable paintbrush to vacuuming a sofa and knife-creasing throw pillows. Doyle's first rule of cleaning echoes that of many household experts: "top to bottom." This technique drives all dust, cobwebs, pet hair and shower scum downward from ceilings, walls and furnishings. Once on the floor, the collective mess becomes a snap to vacuum, sweep or mop up. His second-favorite direction is "from the farthest point to the door," which allows the cleaner to exit without tracking dirt over newly pristine surfaces. Yikes! In less than 10 minutes, I had acquired two foundations of cleaning. But real Maid Pro students learn much more, especially the overarching lesson of the order of chores. First, strip the beds and put sheets and pillowcases in the washer. Then clean the whole kitchen, which is the toughest room in the house and gets a full half-hour of attention. (Doyle loves washing kitchen floors with a "Sh-mop," its large head covered by an abrasive pad and elasticized cloth cap). Continue by cleaning all bathroom surfaces before doing the bedrooms. Finish the laundry and bathrooms, clean the hallway and stairwell, and end up in the living and dining rooms. MaidPro owners nationwide must use the same cleaning products, most of them from Procter & Gamble, including a liquid Comet cleanser that is not available to the public. The techniques are also uniform. Take the toilet: Spray liquid scouring solution on the outside, from the top of the tank to the base of the throne. Pour Mr. Clean Toilet Bowl Cleaner into the water. Wait 15 minutes, wipe the exterior with a nylon scrubby and a microfiber cloth (color coded so it will not mistakenly be reused in the kitchen, thank heavens). Tackle the bowl with a long-handled toilet brush. For framed art, spray Windex onto a paper towel to clean the glass. Spraying the glass directly may ruin the picture behind it. To shine a metal frame, first remove the photo, glass and backing, then apply polish (Doyle uses Nonox for Brass, Mrs. Wright's Silver Cream for sterling or silverplate and a soft toothbrush for detail work). When the polish dries, rinse it off with hot water and completely dry the frame with a soft cloth before reassembly. He routinely damp-cleans hardwood floors with a mild solution of four ounces of Spic and Span and 28 ounces of water. Occasionally, he uses Dura Seal paste wax on a wood floor and polishes it to high gleam with an electric buffer. He uses Riccar upright and tank vacuums with HEPA filters for most tasks, but prefers a ProTeam backpack vacuum for draperies because the wand has an adjustable suction vent and the machine is light enough for the cleaner to wear while climbing a ladder. In dusting furniture -- MaidPro uses Starfiber microfiber cloths because they create enough static to attract dust and pet hair -- he instructs cleaners to move every single knickknack and clean each with a brush before applying the fabric to the tabletop. He generally just dusts wooden furniture or goes over it with a cloth slightly dampened with a diluted Spic and Span solution because, over time, Doyle says, aerosol furniture polish containing silicon softens the finish and makes it less dirt-resistant and more scratch-prone. There are other rules to master, including these: Always put newspaper on the floor before de-gunking an oven, never spray cleaners on or near a fish tank or pet cage, and check for toothpaste splatters on bathroom mirrors. After several weeks of MaidPro University training, it's time for "graduation" to a team of one's own. In this area, MaidPro prices range from about $60 for a condo (oven and refrigerator cleaning cost extra, and the firm will not do personal laundry) to $1,200 for a five-story ambassador's residence. To be sure, other commercial services also train their staffs, although they don't call it college. Maid Brigade, based in Atlanta with several Washington area franchises, offers a week-long combination of morning classes and afternoon hands-on cleaning lessons. Chicago-based Merry Maids, the nation's largest franchise cleaning service, not only trains its own workforce but posts helpful hints on its Web site (www.merrymaids.com) for the rest of us. Who knew that lemon oil applied to bathroom tile walls can retard soap-scum buildup? Ditto for car or boat wax on the sides of a porcelain bathtub (do not for a second think about waxing the bottom of the tub and inviting a horrific fall). If stubborn toilet bowl rings don't succumb to an acid-based bowl cleaner and a nylon-backed scrubby sponge, attack them with a pumice stone (it must always be kept wet during rubbing). This will work only on vitreous porcelain. I cannot wait to run my own private tutorial for the industrious young woman who currently cleans my apartment every other week. But first I must buy some microfiber cloths, a fat paintbrush and a Sh-mop. |